Energy saving projects in buildings: obstacles and incentives

Dear Colleagues,

Investing in renovation of existing buildings provides excellent opportunities for an effective reduction of energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. That is delivering the Sustainable Development Goals and reducing climate risks, in line with the Paris Agreement. But according to the Buildings Performance Institute Europe (BPIE) only 3% of the public funds that could be used to support energy-efficiency investments in the Central, Eastern and South-East Europe region are dedicated to upgrading buildings. Even though the region is burdened with energy poverty and energy security concerns, the current allocation of EU and international funds shows that buildings are not considered to be critical energy infrastructure, despite the potential of deep renovation to reduce energy dependency, increase savings on energy bills, reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve health and air quality. The implementation of energy saving measures has to be done very carefully with a strict quality control. The usage of some materials and techniques can provide a good level of energy saving, but at the same time could lead to harmful impacts to the environment and human health.

Considering the diversity of experiences on implementing energy saving projects in buildings by the North-West Europe region countries and the beginning of this path for many of Central, Eastern and South-East Europe region countries the comparison study is needed. It will help to understand which incentives were successful and which obstacles still hold back the number of implemented projects in Europe. Also, we hope to find out which items related to the environmental friendliness and social significance of energy saving measures are being considered.

We would like to invite interested colleagues to take part in the study, in order to increase the quantity and quality of energy saving projects in buildings. The survey covers 9 short questions only which could be answered in 10 minutes.

As usual, the results will be published as a scientific article in a high-impact journal, and those contributing to the work are able to obtain a copy of the paper when it is completed, if they wish (see item 10 of the instrument).

Please fill the tables following the instructions. Your responses are completely confidential.
We appreciate and thank your for your cooperation!
 

Question Title

* 1. What are the obstacles of the implementation of energy saving measures in buildings in your country?

  strongly disagree disagree neutral agree strongly agree
Imperfect legislation/regulation
Lack of proper financial stimulation
Low confidence in the authorities
Lack of energy waste control
Market of energy saving services is not developed enough
Low level of awareness of stakeholders
Lack of commercial investments in energy saving
Low return of investment
Low energy prices
Subsidies for energy consumption
Passivity of building owners

Question Title

* 2. Energy saving in buildings is in the most cases financed by:

  don’t know not at all partially to a great extend fully
Building owners
Government
Municipality
International Funds
Private companies
Banks (loans)

Question Title

* 3. Who has to stimulate the investment of energy saving measures in buildings (several items can be chosen):

Question Title

* 4. What are the risks of implementing energy saving measures in buildings?

Question Title

* 5. How likely would the following items be to motivate stakeholders to implement energy saving measures in buildings?

  don’t know not at all partially to a great extend fully
Cost savings
Comfortable indoor conditions
Willingness to reduce environmental impacts
Energy independence of the country
Support of the local Municipality
Current government legislation/regulation
Anticipated government legislation/regulation
Easier access to low cost loans
Easier access to information on options available
Easier access to the reimbursement of costs
Easier access to international Funds

Question Title

* 6. The incentives for implementing energy saving measures in buildings which have been applied in the past were :

  don’t know not at all partially to a great extend fully
Improved state policy
Improved regulatory frameworks
Creation of more favorable conditions for investment in energy saving measures
Financial support of energy saving projects
Increase of the quality of energy saving services offered on the market
Creation of more favorable conditions for access to energy saving technologies
Improved the exchange of information on demand and supply in the services market

Question Title

* 7. There is a need for an evaluation of environmental friendliness and social significance of energy saving measures:

Question Title

* 8. Which tools/indicators can be used to evaluate the environmental friendliness and social significance of energy saving measures?

  strongly disagree disagree neutral agree strongly agree
Life cycle analysis
Cost benefits analysis
Number of new working places
Indoor comfort (indoor temperature, humidity)
CO2 emissions reduction according to resource efficiency
Increase of Landfills (in case you don’t have a recycling)
Distance from suppliers to the refurbishment location
Lifespan of materials/refurbishment

Question Title

* 9. What has to be done to increase the quality of energy saving projects and to control the environmental impacts from implemented measures?

  don’t know not at all partially to a great extend fully
Implementation and monitoring of database with information on energy saving services providers
Financial stimulation of energy saving measures based on integrated socio-economic-environmental indexes
Training and education programs for energy saving service providers
Training and education programs for consumers

Question Title

* 10. Personal data

T