ICANN72 - ccNSO satisfaction survey

Question Title

* 1. Overall, how satisfied or dissatisfied are you with the ICANN72 ccNSO Members Meeting?

Very satisfied

Somewhat satisfied

Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied

Somewhat dissatisfied

Very dissatisfied

Question Title

* 2. How would you rate the following items?

	excellent	very good	good	fair	poor	not applicable
Relevance of the presentations	Relevance of the presentations excellent	Relevance of the presentations very good	Relevance of the presentations good	Relevance of the presentations fair	Relevance of the presentations poor	Relevance of the presentations not applicable
Relevance of the sessions	Relevance of the sessions excellent	Relevance of the sessions very good	Relevance of the sessions good	Relevance of the sessions fair	Relevance of the sessions poor	Relevance of the sessions not applicable
Opportunity for exchange of information with other participants	Opportunity for exchange of information with other participants excellent	Opportunity for exchange of information with other participants very good	Opportunity for exchange of information with other participants good	Opportunity for exchange of information with other participants fair	Opportunity for exchange of information with other participants poor	Opportunity for exchange of information with other participants not applicable
Quality of the presentations	Quality of the presentations excellent	Quality of the presentations very good	Quality of the presentations good	Quality of the presentations fair	Quality of the presentations poor	Quality of the presentations not applicable
Information available online prior to the meeting	Information available online prior to the meeting excellent	Information available online prior to the meeting very good	Information available online prior to the meeting good	Information available online prior to the meeting fair	Information available online prior to the meeting poor	Information available online prior to the meeting not applicable
Organisational arrangements during the ccNSO Members Meeting (e.g. timing)	Organisational arrangements during the ccNSO Members Meeting (e.g. timing) excellent	Organisational arrangements during the ccNSO Members Meeting (e.g. timing) very good	Organisational arrangements during the ccNSO Members Meeting (e.g. timing) good	Organisational arrangements during the ccNSO Members Meeting (e.g. timing) fair	Organisational arrangements during the ccNSO Members Meeting (e.g. timing) poor	Organisational arrangements during the ccNSO Members Meeting (e.g. timing) not applicable
Remote participation arrangements	Remote participation arrangements excellent	Remote participation arrangements very good	Remote participation arrangements good	Remote participation arrangements fair	Remote participation arrangements poor	Remote participation arrangements not applicable

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 3. How would you rate the following ccNSO Members Meeting sessions? As a reminder, consult the agenda here: https://community.icann.org/x/hAEuCg

	excellent	very good	good	fair	poor	I did not attend
ccNSO governance session \| Tue, 26 Oct	ccNSO governance session \| Tue, 26 Oct excellent	ccNSO governance session \| Tue, 26 Oct very good	ccNSO governance session \| Tue, 26 Oct good	ccNSO governance session \| Tue, 26 Oct fair	ccNSO governance session \| Tue, 26 Oct poor	ccNSO governance session \| Tue, 26 Oct I did not attend
Q&A Council Candidates \| Tue, 26 Oct	Q&A Council Candidates \| Tue, 26 Oct excellent	Q&A Council Candidates \| Tue, 26 Oct very good	Q&A Council Candidates \| Tue, 26 Oct good	Q&A Council Candidates \| Tue, 26 Oct fair	Q&A Council Candidates \| Tue, 26 Oct poor	Q&A Council Candidates \| Tue, 26 Oct I did not attend
ccNSO DNS Abuse Session \| Wed, 27 Oct	ccNSO DNS Abuse Session \| Wed, 27 Oct excellent	ccNSO DNS Abuse Session \| Wed, 27 Oct very good	ccNSO DNS Abuse Session \| Wed, 27 Oct good	ccNSO DNS Abuse Session \| Wed, 27 Oct fair	ccNSO DNS Abuse Session \| Wed, 27 Oct poor	ccNSO DNS Abuse Session \| Wed, 27 Oct I did not attend
pre-ICANN72 ccTLD News Session (Marketing & operational) \| 6 Oct	pre-ICANN72 ccTLD News Session (Marketing & operational) \| 6 Oct excellent	pre-ICANN72 ccTLD News Session (Marketing & operational) \| 6 Oct very good	pre-ICANN72 ccTLD News Session (Marketing & operational) \| 6 Oct good	pre-ICANN72 ccTLD News Session (Marketing & operational) \| 6 Oct fair	pre-ICANN72 ccTLD News Session (Marketing & operational) \| 6 Oct poor	pre-ICANN72 ccTLD News Session (Marketing & operational) \| 6 Oct I did not attend
pre-ICANN72 ccTLD News Session (internet governance) \| 7 Oct	pre-ICANN72 ccTLD News Session (internet governance) \| 7 Oct excellent	pre-ICANN72 ccTLD News Session (internet governance) \| 7 Oct very good	pre-ICANN72 ccTLD News Session (internet governance) \| 7 Oct good	pre-ICANN72 ccTLD News Session (internet governance) \| 7 Oct fair	pre-ICANN72 ccTLD News Session (internet governance) \| 7 Oct poor	pre-ICANN72 ccTLD News Session (internet governance) \| 7 Oct I did not attend

Other (please specify)

Question Title

* 4. What aspect(s) of the ccNSO Members Meeting went particularly well?

Question Title

* 5. What aspect(s) of the ccNSO Members Meeting need(s) improvement?

Question Title

* 6. What topics do you like to see addressed at the next ccNSO Members Meeting (ICANN73, March 2022)?

Question Title

* 7. Do you have any other comments, questions, or concerns?